Priority-Based Power Capping in Data Processing Systems

ABSTRACT

A mechanism is provided for priority-based power capping. A power management controller identifies a set of priorities for a set of partitions of the data processing system. The power management controller determines whether a measured power of the data processing system exceeds a power cap for the data processing system. Responsive to the measured power exceeding the power cap, the power management controller sends a set of commands to a set of component actuators to adjust one or more of a set of operation parameters for a set of components associated with the set of partitions using the set of priorities. The set of component actuators adjust the one or more of the set of operational parameters associated with the set of component in order to reduce a power consumption of the data processing system.

BACKGROUND

The present application relates generally to an improved data processingapparatus and method and more specifically to an apparatus and methodfor priority-based power capping in data processing systems.

Power capping is a technique for controlling a total amount of powerbeing consumed in a group of computing systems, a single computingsystem, or a subsystem within a computing system. The value or settingfor a power cap is generally defined by an external or internalmanagement entity. Within a computing system, a power control loopmeasures power at the input to the computing system and adjusts thepower consumption of components in the computing system to meet theidentified power cap setting. These adjustments may affect theperformance of the components and of the entire system. If the measuredpower is less than the power cap, then there is more power available forthe components of the computing system. Thus, the available power may beused by increasing the performance and power consumption of thecomponents of the computing system. If the measured power is more thanthe power cap, then the power must be reduced, which reduces theperformance of components in the computing system.

Current solutions uniformly adjust the performance of components withonly one goal: to meet the power cap setting. Known current solutionsfail to address issues that some components may be running higherpriority or lower priority workloads. Thus, current solutions have noway to distribute the performance change, which results from the changein power consumption or allowed power consumption, in proportion to thewishes expressed by set priority policies or priorities given to thecomputing system components by a user.

SUMMARY

In one illustrative embodiment, a method, in a data processing system,is provided for priority-based power capping. The illustrativeembodiment identifies a set of priorities for a set of partitions of thedata processing system. The illustrative embodiment determines whether ameasured power of the data processing system exceeds a power cap for thedata processing system. The illustrative embodiment sends a set ofcommands to a set of component actuators to adjust one or more of a setof operation parameters for a set of components associated with the setof partitions using the set of priorities in response to the measuredpower exceeding the power cap. The illustrative embodiment adjusts theone or more of the set of operational parameters associated with the setof component in order to reduce a power consumption of the dataprocessing system.

In other illustrative embodiments, a computer program product comprisinga computer useable or readable medium having a computer readable programis provided. The computer readable program, when executed on a computingdevice, causes the computing device to perform various ones, andcombinations of, the operations outlined above with regard to the methodillustrative embodiment.

In yet another illustrative embodiment, a system/apparatus is provided.The system/apparatus may comprise one or more processors and a memorycoupled to the one or more processors. The memory may compriseinstructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, causethe one or more processors to perform various ones, and combinations of,the operations outlined above with regard to the method illustrativeembodiment.

These and other features and advantages of the present invention will bedescribed in, or will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in theart in view of, the following detailed description of the exampleembodiments of the present invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention, as well as a preferred mode of use and further objectivesand advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to thefollowing detailed description of illustrative embodiments when read inconjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 depicts a block diagram of a data processing system with whichaspects of the illustrative embodiments may advantageously be utilized;

FIG. 2 depicts a block diagram of an exemplary logically partitionedplatform in which the illustrative embodiments may be implemented;

FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary block diagram of an implementation of apriority-based power capping mechanism in a data processing system inaccordance with an illustrative embodiment; and

FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart outlining example operations of apriority-based power capping mechanism in accordance with anillustrative embodiment.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In order for power management techniques to be more commonly utilized indata processing systems, especially in mission critical infrastructure,a need exists to identify priorities around workloads that are runningin the data processing system, and to have power capping performed in amanner that considers the priorities. High priority workloads should getmore power and have less performance penalty, if any, than low priorityones.

The illustrative embodiments provide priority-based power cappingmechanisms for coupling priority information about workloads with apower capping function in a data processing system. By coupling priorityinformation about workloads with a power capping function, power cappingmay be carried out in a workload- and priority-aware manner. Priorities,which may be dynamically assigned and may be assigned based on a logicalpartition level, component level, or the like, may be predeterminedpower management policies for virtualized systems and/or based on aseparate user specification. Thus, even when the controller must enforcea power cap, some partitions or components may be exempt and run at fullperformance.

Thus, the illustrative embodiments may be utilized in many differenttypes of data processing environments including a distributed dataprocessing environment, a single data processing device, or the like. Inorder to provide a context for the description of the specific elementsand functionality of the illustrative embodiments, FIGS. 1 and 2 areprovided hereafter as example environments in which aspects of theillustrative embodiments may be implemented. While the descriptionfollowing FIGS. 1 and 2 will focus primarily on a single data processingdevice implementation of a priority-based power capping mechanism, thisis only an example and is not intended to state or imply any limitationwith regard to the features of the present invention. To the contrary,the illustrative embodiments are intended to include distributed dataprocessing environments and embodiments in which priority-based powercapping may be implemented.

Thus, the illustrative embodiments may be utilized in many differenttypes of data processing environments including a distributed dataprocessing environment, a single data processing device, or the like. Inorder to provide a context for the description of the specific elementsand functionality of the illustrative embodiments, FIGS. 1 and 2 areprovided hereafter as example environments in which aspects of theillustrative embodiments may be implemented. While the descriptionfollowing FIGS. 1 and 2 will focus primarily on a single data processingdevice implementation of a priority-based power capping mechanism, thisis only an example and is not intended to state or imply any limitationwith regard to the features of the present invention. To the contrary,the illustrative embodiments are intended to include distributed dataprocessing environments and embodiments in which a priority-based powercapping mechanism may be implemented.

With reference now to the figures and in particular with reference toFIGS. 1-2, example diagrams of data processing environments are providedin which illustrative embodiments of the present invention may beimplemented. It should be appreciated that FIGS. 1-2 are only examplesand are not intended to assert or imply any limitation with regard tothe environments in which aspects or embodiments of the presentinvention may be implemented. Many modifications to the depictedenvironments may be made without departing from the spirit and scope ofthe present invention.

Referring now to the drawings and in particular to FIG. 1, there isdepicted a block diagram of a data processing system with which aspectsof the illustrative embodiments may advantageously be utilized. Asshown, data processing system 100 includes processor units 111 a-111 n.Each of processor units 111 a-111 n includes a processor and a cachememory. For example, processor unit 111 a contains processor 112 a andcache memory 113 a, and processor unit 111 n contains processor 112 nand cache memory 113 n.

Processor units 111 a-111 n are connected to main bus 115. Main bus 115supports system planar 120 that contains processor units 111 a-111 n andmemory cards 123. System planar 120 also contains data switch 121 andmemory controller/cache 122. Memory controller/cache 122 supports memorycards 123 that include local memory 116 having multiple dual in-linememory modules (DIMMs).

Data switch 121 connects to bus bridge 117 and bus bridge 118 locatedwithin native I/O (NIO) planar 124. As shown, bus bridge 118 connects toperipheral components interconnect (PCI) bridges 125 and 126 via systembus 119. PCI bridge 125 connects to a variety of I/O devices via PCI bus128. As shown, hard disk 136 may be connected to PCI bus 128 via smallcomputer system interface (SCSI) host adapter 130. Graphics adapter 131may be directly or indirectly connected to PCI bus 128. PCI bridge 126provides connections for external data streams through network adapter134 and adapter card slots 135 a-135 n via PCI bus 127.

Industry standard architecture (ISA) bus 129 connects to PCI bus 128 viaISA bridge 132. ISA bridge 132 provides interconnection capabilitiesthrough NIO controller 133 having serial connections Serial 1 and Serial2. A floppy drive connection, keyboard connection, and mouse connectionare provided by NIO controller 133 to allow data processing system 100to accept data input from a user via a corresponding input device. Inaddition, non-volatile RAM (NVRAM) 140 provides a non-volatile memoryfor preserving certain types of data from system disruptions or systemfailures, such as power supply problems. System firmware 141 is alsoconnected to ISA bus 129 for implementing the initial firmwarefunctions. Service processor 144 connects to ISA bus 129 to providefunctionality for system diagnostics or system servicing.

The operating system (OS) is stored on hard disk 136, which may alsoprovide storage for additional application software for execution bydata processing system. NVRAM 140 is used to store system variables anderror information for field replaceable unit (FRU) isolation. Duringsystem startup, initial firmware or service processor loads avirtualization control program from either a disk, a flash memory, NVRAM140, or the like. The virtualization control program then initializesand loads operating systems into the partitions. Typically, after eachoperating system is loaded into its own partition, the virtualizationcontrol program splits memory up among the partitions. Once loaded andinitialized, the operating system controls the execution of programs andmay provide services such as resource allocation, scheduling,input/output control, and data management.

The illustrative embodiment may be embodied in a variety of dataprocessing systems utilizing a number of different hardwareconfigurations and software such as bootstrap programs and operatingsystems. The data processing system 100 may be, for example, astand-alone system or part of a network such as a local-area network(LAN) or a wide-area network (WAN). As stated above, FIG. 1 is intendedas an example, not as an architectural limitation for differentembodiments of the present invention, and therefore, the particularelements shown in FIG. 1 should not be considered limiting with regardto the environments in which the illustrative embodiments of the presentinvention may be implemented.

With reference now to FIG. 2, a block diagram of an exemplary logicallypartitioned platform is depicted in which the illustrative embodimentsmay be implemented. The hardware in logically partitioned platform 200may be implemented, for example, using the hardware of data processingsystem 100 in FIG. 1.

Logically partitioned platform 200 includes partitioned hardware 230,operating systems 202, 204, 206, 208, and virtual machine monitor 210.Operating systems 202, 204, 206, and 208 may be multiple copies of asingle operating system or multiple heterogeneous operating systemssimultaneously run on logically partitioned platform 200. Theseoperating systems may be implemented, for example, using AIX®, which isdesigned to interface with a virtualization mechanism, such as partitionmanagement firmware, e.g., a hypervisor. AIX® is used only as an examplein these illustrative embodiments. Of course, other types of operatingsystems, such as AIX® and Linux®, may be used depending on theparticular implementation. Operating systems 202, 204, 206, and 208 arelocated in logical partitions 203, 205, 207, and 209, respectively.

Hypervisor software is an example of software that may be used toimplement platform (in this example, virtual machine monitor 210) and isavailable from International Business Machines Corporation. Firmware is“software” stored in a memory chip that holds its content withoutelectrical power, such as, for example, a read-only memory (ROM), aprogrammable ROM (PROM), an erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), and anelectrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM).

Logical partitions 203, 205, 207, and 209 also include partitionfirmware loaders 211, 213, 215, and 217. Partition firmware loaders 211,213, 215, and 217 may be implemented using IPL or initial boot strapcode, IEEE-1275 Standard Open Firmware, and runtime abstraction software(RTAS), which is available from International Business MachinesCorporation.

When logical partitions 203, 205, 207, and 209 are instantiated, a copyof the boot strap code is loaded into logical partitions 203, 205, 207,and 209 by virtual machine monitor 210. Thereafter, control istransferred to the boot strap code with the boot strap code then loadingthe open firmware and RTAS. The processors associated or assigned tological partitions 203, 205, 207, and 209 are then dispatched to thelogical partition's memory to execute the logical partition firmware.This firmware then loads the operating system for the partition andsupports its execution.

Partitioned hardware 230 includes plurality of processors 232-238,plurality of system memory units 240-246, plurality of input/output(I/O) adapters 248-262, and storage unit 270. Each of the processors232-238, memory units 240-246, NVRAM storage 298, and I/O adapters248-262 may be assigned to one of multiple logical partitions 203, 205,207, and 209 within logically partitioned platform 200, each of whichcorresponds to one of operating systems 202, 204, 206, and 208.

Virtual machine monitor 210 performs a number of functions and servicesfor logical partitions 203, 205, 207, and 209 to generate and enforcethe partitioning of logical partitioned platform 200. Virtual machinemonitor 210 is a firmware implemented virtual machine approximate to theunderlying hardware. Thus, virtual machine monitor 210 allows thesimultaneous execution of independent OS images 202, 204, 206, and 208by virtualizing the hardware resources of logical partitioned platform200.

Service processor 290 may be used to provide various services, such asprocessing of platform errors in logical partitions 203, 205, 207, and209. Service processor 290 may also act as a service agent to reporterrors back to a vendor, such as International Business MachinesCorporation. Operations of the different logical partitions may becontrolled through a hardware management console 280. Hardwaremanagement console 280 is a separate data processing system from which asystem administrator may perform various functions includingreallocation of resources to different logical partitions.

Again, the illustrative embodiments provide mechanisms forpriority-based power capping in data processing systems, such as dataprocessing system 100 in FIG. 1 implementing logically partitionedplatform 200 in FIG. 2. The illustrative embodiments couple priorityinformation about workloads with the power capping function of the dataprocessing system. The priority-based power capping mechanisms allowpower capping to be carried out in a workload- and priority-awaremanner. Priorities may be assigned either dynamically assigned based onpartition-level power management policies for virtualized systems orassigned based on a separate user specification.

FIG. 3 depicts an exemplary block diagram of an implementation of apriority-based power capping mechanism in a data processing system inaccordance with an illustrative embodiment. Priority-based power cappingmechanism 300 comprises power usage measurement module 302, powermanagement controller 304, and component actuators 306, which controlpower to various components 308 in various ones of partitions 318. Powermanagement controller 304 receives policies 312 that are set on apartition-by-partition basis, a component-by-component basis, or thelike. Individual policies are called “modes of the power managementsystem.” Policies 312 that are on a partition by partition basis may beenergy management policies assigned to each individual partitiondepending on the mode the partition is operating under, such as:

-   -   Nominal (NOM) mode, where power management controller 304 runs        the identified partition and associated components at nominal        frequency;    -   Static Power Save (SPS) mode, where power management controller        304 runs the identified partition and associated components at a        fixed lower frequency;    -   Dynamic Power Save (DPS) mode, where power management controller        304 runs the identified partition and associated components at a        lower frequency when “slack” is detected in cases where energy        savings is higher priority than performance, but power        management controller 304 system enforces a performance floor        (e.g., 95% of nominal); and    -   Dynamic Power Save-Max Performance (DPS-MP) mode, where power        management controller 304 runs the identified partition and        associated components as fast as possible given the power        constraints on the system including above nominal by “turboing”        the frequency of the identified processing units for maximum        performance and thus exploits aggressive power capping and power        shifting across chip- and node-level components.

These exemplary modes are provided for illustration purposes only and,thus, the illustrative embodiments are not limited in scope to justthese four policies as other policies may be used without departing fromthe spirit and scope of the invention.

Once power management controller 304 receives policies 312, powermanagement controller 304 transforms or maps policies 312 to the modesthat partitions 318 are operating under in order to form priorities 314.For example, power management controller 304 may set a priority(Pri_(i)) for a partition that is operating in a NOM mode as a priority1, or for a partition that is operating in a SPS mode as a priority 2,or for a partition that is operating in a DPS mode as a priority 3.Additionally, power management controller 304 may use a more complextransformation to set a priority (Pri_(i)) for a partition, such as fora partition that is operating in a DPS-MP mode. For DPS-MP mode, powermanagement controller 304 may determine that, if the current frequencyof the partition i (f_current_i) is greater than a nominal frequency(fnom) of data processing system 310, then power management controller304 assigns the partition i a priority 2. However, if power managementcontroller 304 determines that the current frequency of the partition i(f_current_i) is less than or equal to the nominal frequency (fnom) ofdata processing system 310, then power management controller 304 assignsthe partition i a priority 3.

In addition to priorities 314 determined from policies 312, powermanagement controller 304 may also receive user specified priorities 316from a user. User specified priorities 316 may be a linear ordering ofpartitions based on the priority the user wants the partitions to have,such as Pri(P1)>=Pri(P2)>= . . . >=Pri(Pk). The priorities are thus interms of the importance of not being penalized in performance when powercapping must be enforced.

Once power management controller 304 transforms policies 312 topriorities 314 and identifies any user specified priorities 316, thenpower management controller 304 waits for power usage measurement module302 to provide power measurement information, such as measured power,performance, frequency, or the like, at an input to data processingsystem 310. When power usage measurement module 302 identifies powermeasurement information, power usage measurement module 302 sends thepower measurement information to power management controller 304. Powermanagement controller 304 then determines where the power measurementinformation indicates the power of data processing system 310 is inrelation to a predefined power cap. In cases where the power measurementinformation (P_(measured)) is greater than the predefined power cap(P_(cap)), then power management controller 304 identifies a reductionof power to the components associated with the partitions based on thepriorities 314. That is, power management controller 304 may, forexample, identify a reduction of power to the components associated withthe partitions that have a priority of 3, then the partitions that havea priority of 2, and then partitions that have a priority of 1 until thepower measurement information from power usage measurement module 302indicates that the P_(measured) is less than or equal to P_(cap).

In an alternative example, in cases where the power measurementinformation (P_(measured)) is less than the predefined power cap(P_(cap)), then power management controller 304 may, for example,identify an increase of power to the components associated with thepartitions based on the priorities 314 and user specified priorities316. In this example, power management controller 304 may identify anincrease of power to the components associated with the partitions thathave a priority of 1, then the partitions that have a priority of 2, andthen partitions that have a priority of 3 until the power measurementinformation from power usage measurement module 302 indicates that theP_(measured) is greater than or equal to P_(cap). The increase in powermay be referred to as “boosting”.

In a further example, when power management controller 304 identifiestwo partitions with equal priority that should reduce or increase power,then power management controller may reduce power on one of the twopartitions that exhibits less performance sensitivity to frequency. Inyet another example, power management controller 304 may identify areduction or increase of power to all components associated with thepartitions but reduce power for partitions that have a priority of 3 bya larger amount than the partitions that have a priority of 2 and reducecomponents with a priority of 1 even less than components with apriority of 2 or 3 until the power measurement information from powerusage measurement module 302 indicates that the P_(measured) is lessthan or equal to P_(cap). That is, all of the components have theirpower increased or reduced based on a level commensurate with thepriority of the partition.

The timing with which power management controller 304 identifies anincrease or decrease of power to components may differ based onintervals in which power usage measurement module 302 provides the powermeasurement information. For example, power management controller 304may identify a reduction of power only to components associated with asingle partition that has a priority of 3 and then wait a predeterminedamount of time to see if the decrease reduced P_(measured) below P_(cap)before identifying a reduction of power to components associated with anext single partition that has a priority of 3, 2, or 1. Alternatively,power management controller 304 identify a reduction of power only tocomponents associated with all partitions that have a priority of 3 andthen wait the predetermined amount of time to see if the decreasereduced P_(measured) below P_(cap) before identifying a reduction ofpower to components associated with partitions that have priorities of 2or 1.

Thus, reduction or boost is dependent on whether P_(cap) was exceeded ornot in a last interval of the power measurement information detected bypower usage measurement module 302. If P_(measured) is under P_(cap),then the net increase in performance for a partition is determined byits priority and the total additional power available. If P_(measured)is above P_(cap), then the net decrease in performance for a partitionis determined by an inverse of its priority and the excess power overthe cap. Performance boost or reduction is then proportional to the netpower margin available or exceeded.

Once power management controller 304 identifies an increase or reductionin power for a particular set of components associated with a set ofpartitions, then power management controller 304 sends the associatedcommands to component actuators 306 which control power to components308 associated with the identified set of partitions 318. Componentactuators 306 may then adjust a frequency, a voltage, a pipelineinstruction rate, or the like associated with components 308 in order toreduce the power consumed by components 308. For example, for each corej in partition i made up of core set C_(i), component actuators 306 maydecrease the frequency of core j as proportional to current frequency ofcore j in relation to core set C_(i) and the net reduction in frequencyfor partition i.

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, the present inventionmay be embodied as a system, method, or computer program product.Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirelyhardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (includingfirmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodimentcombining software and hardware aspects that may all generally bereferred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore,the present invention may take the form of a computer program productembodied in any tangible medium of expression having computer usableprogram code embodied in the medium.

Any combination of one or more computer usable or computer readablemedium(s) may be utilized. The computer-usable or computer-readablemedium may be, for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic,optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus,device, or propagation medium. More specific examples (a non-exhaustivelist) of the computer-readable medium would include the following: anelectrical connection having one or more wires, a portable computerdiskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory(ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flashmemory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disc read-only memory(CDROM), an optical storage device, a transmission media such as thosesupporting the Internet or an intranet, or a magnetic storage device.Note that the computer-usable or computer-readable medium could even bepaper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, asthe program can be electronically captured, via, for instance, opticalscanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted, orotherwise processed in a suitable manner, if necessary, and then storedin a computer memory. In the context of this document, a computer-usableor computer-readable medium may be any medium that can contain, store,communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or inconnection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.The computer-usable medium may include a propagated data signal with thecomputer-usable program code embodied therewith, either in baseband oras part of a carrier wave. The computer usable program code may betransmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited towireless, wireline, optical fiber cable, radio frequency (RF), etc.

Computer program code for carrying out operations of the presentinvention may be written in any combination of one or more programminglanguages, including an object oriented programming language such asJava™, Smalltalk™, C++ or the like and conventional proceduralprogramming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similarprogramming languages. The program code may execute entirely on theuser's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alonesoftware package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remotecomputer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latterscenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computerthrough any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or awide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an externalcomputer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet ServiceProvider). In addition, the program code may be embodied on a computerreadable storage medium on the server or the remote computer anddownloaded over a network to a computer readable storage medium of theremote computer or the users' computer for storage and/or execution.Moreover, any of the computing systems or data processing systems maystore the program code in a computer readable storage medium afterhaving downloaded the program code over a network from a remotecomputing system or data processing system.

The illustrative embodiments are described below with reference toflowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus(systems) and computer program products according to the illustrativeembodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block ofthe flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations ofblocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can beimplemented by computer program instructions. These computer programinstructions may be provided to a processor of a general purposecomputer, special purpose computer, or other programmable dataprocessing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions,which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmabledata processing apparatus, create means for implementing thefunctions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block orblocks.

These computer program instructions may also be stored in acomputer-readable medium that can direct a computer or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to function in a particularmanner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readablemedium produce an article of manufacture including instruction meanswhich implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or blockdiagram block or blocks.

The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer orother programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series ofoperational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmableapparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that theinstructions which execute on the computer or other programmableapparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/actsspecified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The flowchart and block diagrams in the figures illustrate thearchitecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementationsof systems, methods and computer program products according to variousembodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in theflowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portionof code, which comprises one or more executable instructions forimplementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be notedthat, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in theblock may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, twoblocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantiallyconcurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverseorder, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be notedthat each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, andcombinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchartillustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-basedsystems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations ofspecial purpose hardware and computer instructions.

Referring now to FIG. 4, this figure provides a flowchart outliningexample operations of a priority-based power capping mechanism inaccordance with an illustrative embodiment. As the operation begins, apower management controller receives a set of predefined policies and/oruser-specified priorities for a set of partitions that are defined asthe partitions are generated (step 402). The user specified prioritiesmay be a linear ordering of partitions based on the priority the userwants the partitions to have, such as Pri(P1)>=Pri(P2)>= . .. >=Pri(Pk). The set of predefined policies and/or user-specifiedpriorities may then be used to form a set of priorities (step 404) basedon a defined mapping of power management policies to priorities. Thepower management controller may set a priority for a partition basedsolely on the mode the partition is operating under or based on the modeand a current frequency of the partition in relation to a nominalfrequency of the data processing system in which the partition resides.

Using the set of priorities derived from the power management policies,if any, and the set of user specified priorities, if any, the powermanagement controller combines the inputs into a set of priorities,which the power management controller then uses to manage the powercapping actions performed by the power management controller (step 406).The combination or mapping function may be any one of a number of simpleschemes including having the user priorities override the ones derivedfrom the partition policies or the schemes may optionally include adefault set of priorities. At this point, the power managementcontroller waits for a power usage measurement module to provide powermeasurement information, such as measured power, performance, frequency,or the like, at an input to data processing system (step 408).

When the power management controller receives power measurementinformation from the power usage measurement module, the powermanagement controller determines whether the measured power(P_(measured)) is greater than a predefined power cap (P_(cap)) (step410). If at step 410 the power management controller determines that themeasured power (P_(measured)) is greater than a predefined power cap(P_(cap)), then power management controller identifies a reduction ofpower to the components associated with one or more of the set ofpartitions based on the set of priorities and the user specifiedpriorities (step 412). That is, for instance, the power managementcontroller identifies a reduction of power to the components associatedwith the partitions that have a priority of 3, then the partitions thathave a priority of 2, and then partitions that have a priority of 1until the power measurement information from the power usage measurementmodule indicates that the P_(measured) is less than or equal to P_(cap).

If at step 410 the power management controller determines that themeasured power (P_(measured)) is less than the predefined power cap(P_(cap)), then the power management controller identifies an increaseof power to the components associated with one or more of the set ofpartitions based on the set of priorities and the user specifiedpriorities (step 414). That is, the power management controller mayidentify an increase of power to the components associated with thepartitions that, for example, have a priority of 1, then the partitionsthat have a priority of 2, and then partitions that have a priority of 3until the power measurement information from power usage measurementmodule indicates that the P_(measured) is greater than or equal toP_(cap).

From steps 412 or 414, once the power management controller identifiesan increase or reduction in power for a particular set of componentsassociated with a set of partitions, then the power managementcontroller sends the associated commands to a set of component actuatorswhich control power to the set of components associated with theidentified set of partitions (step 416). The component actuators maythen adjust a set of operational parameters, such as a frequency, avoltage, a pipeline instruction rate, or the like, of the set ofcomponents associated with the identified set of partitions in order toreduce or increase the power consumed by the set of components (step418). Since the set of policies and the user specified priorities aredynamically defined, the power management controller determines whetherthe set of policies or the user specified priorities have been updated(step 420). If at step 420 the set of policies or the user specifiedpriorities have been updated, then the operation returns to step 402. Ifat step 420 the set of policies or the user specified priorities are notupdated, then the operation returns to step 408.

Thus, the illustrative embodiments provide mechanisms for apriority-based power capping mechanism for coupling priority informationabout workloads with a power capping function in a data processingsystem. By coupling priority information about workloads with a powercapping function, power capping may be carried out in a workload- andpriority-aware manner. Priorities, which may be dynamically assigned andmay be assigned based on a partition-level, component level, or thelike, may be predetermined power management policies for virtualizedsystems and/or based on a separate user specification. Thus, even whenthe controller must enforce a power cap, some partitions or componentsmay be exempt and run at full performance.

As noted above, it should be appreciated that the illustrativeembodiments may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, anentirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardwareand software elements. In one example embodiment, the mechanisms of theillustrative embodiments are implemented in software or program code,which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software,microcode, etc.

A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing programcode will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectlyto memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can includelocal memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulkstorage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at leastsome program code in order to reduce the number of times code must beretrieved from bulk storage during execution.

Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards,displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system eitherdirectly or through intervening I/O controllers. Network adapters mayalso be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system tobecome coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers orstorage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems,cable modems and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currentlyavailable types of network adapters.

The description of the present invention has been presented for purposesof illustration and description, and is not intended to be exhaustive orlimited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications andvariations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Theembodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain theprinciples of the invention, the practical application, and to enableothers of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention forvarious embodiments with various modifications as are suited to theparticular use contemplated.

1. A method, in a data processing system, for priority-based powercapping, the method comprising: identifying, by a power managementcontroller, a set of priorities for a set of partitions of the dataprocessing system; determining, by the power management controller,whether a measured power of the data processing system exceeds a powercap for the data processing system; responsive to the measured powerexceeding the power cap, sending, by the power management controller, aset of commands to a set of component actuators to adjust one or more ofa set of operation parameters for a set of components associated withthe set of partitions using the set of priorities; and adjusting, by theset of component actuators, the one or more of the set of operationalparameters associated with the set of component in order to reduce apower consumption of the data processing system.
 2. The method of claim1, wherein using the set of priorities to adjust one or more of the setof operation parameters for the set of components associated with theset of partitions identifies that one or more partitions within the setof partitions that have a lower priority have their associated one ofthe set of operation parameters adjusted prior to other partitionswithin the set of partitions that have a higher priority.
 3. The methodof claim 1, further comprising: responsive to the measured power beingless than the power cap, sending, by the power management controller, aset of commands to the set of component actuators to adjust one or moreof a set of operation parameters for a set of components associated withthe set of partitions using on the set of priorities; and adjusting, bythe set of component actuators, the one or more of the set ofoperational parameters associated with the set of component in order toincrease the power consumption of the data processing system.
 4. Themethod of claim 3, wherein using the set of priorities to adjust one ormore of the set of operation parameters for the set of componentsassociated with the set of partitions identifies that one or morepartitions within the set of partitions that have a higher priority havetheir associated one of the set of operation parameters adjusted priorto other partitions within the set of partitions that have a lowerpriority.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein using the set of prioritiesto adjust one or more of the set of operation parameters for the set ofcomponents associated with the set of partitions identifies twopartitions with equal priority and wherein a first partition within thetwo partitions that exhibits less performance sensitivity to frequencyis adjusted prior to a second partition within the two partitions. 6.The method of claim 1, wherein using the set of priorities to adjust oneor more of the set of operation parameters for the set of componentsassociated with the set of partitions identifies an adjustment of powerto each component in the set of components associated with thepartitions based on an amount commensurate with the priority of eachcomponent.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of priorities forthe set of partitions are formed using at least one of a set ofpredefined policies, a set of user-specified priorities or a set ofdefault priorities.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the set ofoperational parameters is at least one of frequency, voltage, orpipeline instruction rate.
 9. A computer program product comprising acomputer recordable medium having a computer readable program recordedthereon, wherein the computer readable program, when executed on acomputing device, causes the computing device to: identify a set ofpriorities for a set of partitions of the data processing system;determine whether a measured power of the data processing system exceedsa power cap for the data processing system; responsive to the measuredpower exceeding the power cap, send a set of commands to a set ofcomponent actuators to adjust one or more of a set of operationparameters for a set of components associated with the set of partitionsusing the set of priorities; and adjust the one or more of the set ofoperational parameters associated with the set of component in order toreduce a power consumption of the data processing system.
 10. Thecomputer program product of claim 9, wherein using the set of prioritiesto adjust one or more of the set of operation parameters for the set ofcomponents associated with the set of partitions identifies that one ormore partitions within the set of partitions that have a lower priorityhave their associated one of the set of operation parameters adjustedprior to other partitions within the set of partitions that have ahigher priority.
 11. The computer program product of claim 9, whereinthe computer readable program further causes the computing device to:responsive to the measured power being less than the power cap, send aset of commands to the set of component actuators to adjust one or moreof a set of operation parameters for a set of components associated withthe set of partitions using on the set of priorities; and adjust the oneor more of the set of operational parameters associated with the set ofcomponent in order to increase the power consumption of the dataprocessing system.
 12. The computer program product of claim 11, whereinusing the set of priorities to adjust one or more of the set ofoperation parameters for the set of components associated with the setof partitions identifies that one or more partitions within the set ofpartitions that have a higher priority have their associated one of theset of operation parameters adjusted prior to other partitions withinthe set of partitions that have a lower priority.
 13. The computerprogram product of claim 9, wherein using the set of priorities toadjust one or more of the set of operation parameters for the set ofcomponents associated with the set of partitions identifies twopartitions with equal priority and wherein a first partition within thetwo partitions that exhibits less performance sensitivity to frequencyis adjusted prior to a second partition within the two partitions. 14.The computer program product of claim 9, wherein using the set ofpriorities to adjust one or more of the set of operation parameters forthe set of components associated with the set of partitions identifies aincrease or reduction of power to each component in the set ofcomponents associated with the partitions based on an amountcommensurate with the priority of each component.
 15. An apparatus,comprising: a processor; and a memory coupled to the processor, whereinthe memory comprises instructions which, when executed by the processor,cause the processor to: identify a set of priorities for a set ofpartitions of the data processing system; determine whether a measuredpower of the data processing system exceeds a power cap for the dataprocessing system; responsive to the measured power exceeding the powercap, send a set of commands to a set of component actuators to adjustone or more of a set of operation parameters for a set of componentsassociated with the set of partitions using the set of priorities; andadjust the one or more of the set of operational parameters associatedwith the set of component in order to reduce a power consumption of thedata processing system.
 16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein using theset of priorities to adjust one or more of the set of operationparameters for the set of components associated with the set ofpartitions identifies that one or more partitions within the set ofpartitions that have a lower priority have their associated one of theset of operation parameters adjusted prior to other partitions withinthe set of partitions that have a higher priority.
 17. The apparatus ofclaim 15, wherein the instructions further cause the processor to:responsive to the measured power being less than the power cap, send aset of commands to the set of component actuators to adjust one or moreof a set of operation parameters for a set of components associated withthe set of partitions using on the set of priorities; and adjust the oneor more of the set of operational parameters associated with the set ofcomponent in order to increase the power consumption of the dataprocessing system.
 18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein using the setof priorities to adjust one or more of the set of operation parametersfor the set of components associated with the set of partitionsidentifies that one or more partitions within the set of partitions thathave a higher priority have their associated one of the set of operationparameters adjusted prior to other partitions within the set ofpartitions that have a lower priority.
 19. The apparatus of claim 15,wherein using the set of priorities to adjust one or more of the set ofoperation parameters for the set of components associated with the setof partitions identifies two partitions with equal priority and whereina first partition within the two partitions that exhibits lessperformance sensitivity to frequency is adjusted prior to a secondpartition within the two partitions.
 20. The apparatus of claim 15,wherein using the set of priorities to adjust one or more of the set ofoperation parameters for the set of components associated with the setof partitions identifies a increase or reduction of power to eachcomponent in the set of components associated with the partitions basedon an amount commensurate with the priority of each component.